Abstract

Background: Same-sex pairing is common in many animal species. In many insects, same-sex pairing is often thought to be a result of poor sexual discrimination (i.e., a mistake), but few detailed studies of the mechanisms underlying the mistaken pairing have been conducted. Previous studies have found that in the field, a small proportion of Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica) mating pairs consist of two males instead of a male and a female. In the current study, we investigated the relationship between body size, the tendency to mount other males, and the duration of these mounts, in laboratory experiments on male Japanese beetles. Results: In the first experiment, we observed male-male mounting in all-male groups in which each male had been uniquely marked. Males of all sizes were likely to mount other males and extend their aedeagus (copulatory organ), but the mounts were longer, and aedeagus extension was more likely to occur, if the mounted beetle (in the ‘female’ position) was larger than the mounting beetle (in the ‘male’ position). In the second experiment, we observed male-female behavior in mixed-sex groups. Females did not immediately copulate with males that had mounted them. If copulation did occur, males tended to remain on the back of females for an extended period of time. Males that mounted other males in mixed-sex groups tended to mate subsequently with a female and then stay with her. Conclusions: We propose that the minimal physical difference between the sexes, in combination with benefits to the males of rapidly attempting to pair with any available female, explains the tendency for males to mount other males. Extended mounts may occur because larger individuals are more likely to be female and because of selection on males to persist in a copulation attempt when females do not immediately copulate with a male.

Highlights

  • Same-sex pairing is common in many animal species

  • Same-sex pairing is not thought to have any direct benefit to the mounting male, that is, they are making mistakes (e.g., Harari et al 2000)

  • Same-sex pairings may be brief in some cases (1 to 2 s in the case of Palmacorixa nana; Aiken 1981) and of little consequence to males, in other cases, pairings may last for an extended period of time leading to lost mating opportunities, energetic costs, and lowered survival (MØller 1987; Dickinson 1992, 1995; Shine et al 2000; Maklakov and Bonduriansky 2009)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Same-sex pairing is often thought to be a result of poor sexual discrimination (i.e., a mistake), but few detailed studies of the mechanisms underlying the mistaken pairing have been conducted. Same-sex pairing is not thought to have any direct benefit to the mounting male, that is, they are making mistakes (e.g., Harari et al 2000). Studies of three species - a water bug (Palmacorixa nana; Aiken 1981), the sugarcane root borer weevil (Diaprepes abbreviatus; Harari et al 2000), Detailed investigations of this ‘mistaken identity’ hypothesis (Scharf and Martin 2013) for same-sex pairing in such species would be valuable for at least two reasons. One might be able to use the characteristics of mistaken choices to understand the sex recognition system and mate quality recognition system a species uses. This knowledge could be applied to examine whether these two recognition systems reinforce each other (i.e., the cues used indicate a high quality mate and the correct sex) or are in conflict (i.e., the cues used indicate a high quality mate but the wrong sex), much as species recognition and mate preference may be reinforcing or conflicting (Ryan and Rand 1993; Pfennig 1998, 2000; Hankison and Morris 2003)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call