Abstract

Many ejaculate traits show remarkable variation in relation to male social status. Males in disfavoured (subordinate) mating positions often invest heavily on sperm motility but may have less available resources on traits (e.g., secondary sexual ornaments) that improve the probability of gaining matings. Although higher investments in sperm motility can increase the relative fertilization success of subordinate males, it is unclear whether status-dependent differences in sperm traits could have any consequences for offspring fitness. We tested this possibility in whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L.) by experimentally fertilizing the eggs of 24 females with the sperm of either highly-ornamented (large breeding tubercles, dominant) or less-ornamented (small tubercles, subordinate) males (split-clutch breeding design). In comparison to highly-ornamented individuals, less-ornamented males had higher sperm motility, which fertilized the eggs more efficiently, but produced embryos with impaired hatching success. Also offspring size and body condition were lower among less-ornamented males. Furthermore, sperm motility was positively associated with the fertilization success and offspring size, but only in highly-ornamented males. Together our results indicate that male investments on highly motile (fertile) sperm is not necessarily advantageous during later offspring ontogeny and that male status-dependent differences in sperm phenotype may have important effects on offspring fitness in different life-history stages.

Highlights

  • Sperm competition theory predicts that reproductive males face a trade-off between number of matings gained and resources allocated on a single mating event or an ejaculate [1,2]

  • Less-ornamented males had higher sperm motility than highly-ornamented individuals (LMM, PC1: d.f. = 23, t = -2,649, P = 0.014) (Fig 1A), but no statistically significant difference was found between groups in sperm swimming trajectory, the curvature of sperm swimming pattern tend to be higher in highly-ornamented individuals (PC2: d.f. = 23, t = -1.734, P = 0.096)

  • Group-specific analyses revealed that sperm motility predicted sperm fertilization success in highly-ornamented males, i.e. the males with lower sperm motility (Pearson, r = 0.406, P = 0.049), but no association was found for less-ornamented males (r = 0.009, P = 0.967) (Fig 2A)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sperm competition theory predicts that reproductive males face a trade-off between number of matings gained and resources allocated on a single mating event or an ejaculate [1,2]. Male investments on traits improving the probability of gaining matings (e.g. secondary sexual ornaments) are expected to lead to a reduction in sperm quality or quantity [3,4,5,6,7]. Sperm Quality and Offspring Fitness subordinates) invest more on their semen than males in more favoured mating roles [8,9,10,11,12,13]. As fertilization success under sperm competition is largely dependent on ejaculate quantity and/or quality As fertilization success under sperm competition is largely dependent on ejaculate quantity and/or quality (e.g. [20,21,22]), sperm plasticity may allow subordinate individuals to compensate their reproductive disadvantage in relation to dominant individuals (e.g. [13,23,24])

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call