Abstract

Nearly a decade after the adoption of confirmed diagnosis and artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria, a large treatment gap persists. We describe a novel approach of combining data from households and the universe of treatment sources in their vicinities to produce nationally representative indicators of physical and financial access to malaria care from the household’s perspective in Benin, Nigeria, Uganda and Zambia. We compare differences in access across urban and rural areas, countries, and over time.In 2009, more urban households had a provider stocking ACT within 5 km than rural households. By 2012, this physical ACT access gap had largely been closed in Uganda, and progress had been made in Benin and Nigeria; but the gap persisted in Zambia. The private sector helped to fill this gap in rural areas. Improvements in Nigeria and Uganda were driven largely by increased ACT availability in licensed drug stores, and in Benin by increased availability in unregulated open-air market stalls. Free or subsidised ACT from public and non-profit facilities continued to be available to many households by 2012, but much less so in rural areas. Where private sector expansion increased physical access to ACT, these additional options were on average more expensive. Also by 2012, the majority of urban households in all four countries had access to a provider nearby offering malaria diagnostic services; however, this access remained low for rural households in Benin, Nigeria and Zambia.The methods developed in this study could improve how access to healthcare is measured in low- and middle-income country settings, particularly where private for-profit providers are an important source of care, and for conditions that may be treated by informal providers. The method could also lead to better explanations of the performance of complex interventions aiming to improve healthcare access.

Highlights

  • To illustrate, nearly a decade has passed since the WorldHealth Organization (WHO) updated its guidelines for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria to recommend confirmed diagnosis and artemisinin combination therapy (ACT), it is estimated that among febrile children in sub-SaharanAfrica for whom care was sought, only 30% received a diagnostic test either by microscopy or rapid diagnostic test (RDT) in 2014-16 (WHOGlobal Malaria Programme, 2017)

  • We demonstrate the utility of this approach by estimating a select range of physical and financial access indicators that characterise the malaria treatment options available to households with a febrile child in Benin, Nigeria, Uganda and Zambia, and use these to describe how access has changed over time

  • By combining data from households with information on the complete range of treatment sources in their vicinities, we have produced a variety of nationally representative indicators that describe malaria treatment access from the household perspective, and how this has changed over time in dynamic, pluralistic health care markets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Health Organization (WHO) updated its guidelines for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria to recommend confirmed diagnosis and ACT, it is estimated that among febrile children in sub-Saharan. Many of those with malaria do not receive ACT. Studies in Tanzania found that among cases positive for malaria by reference blood slide, just over half (50.2%) received ACT in government facilities and less than a third of those who sought care from private drug stores (Briggs et al, 2014; Bruxvoort et al, 2013). Effective management for uncomplicated cases of Plasmodium falciparum malaria, the species causing the majority of fatal infections, requires confirmed diagnosis and, if positive, treatment with artemisinin combination therapy (ACT), ideally prescribed and dispensed from a qualified provider. Access to appropriate diagnosis and treatment is still inadequate, resulting in a large treatment gap where many cases are managed suboptimally or even go untreated

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.