Abstract

Paying homage to one of Dr. Guðrún Alda Harðardóttir’s academic gurus, Loris Malaguzzi, this chapter compares and contrasts the views of Malaguzzi on early-years moral education with those of two of his own academic influencers, Aristotle and John Dewey. Regarding education at the preschool level, all three thinkers turn out to have strengths and weaknesses when it comes to this particular topic and developmental level. It is suggested that the key to drawing serviceable lessons from those disparate authors may lie in aspiring to some sort of synthesis of their views, which retains the strengths but ameliorates the weaknesses. More precisely, Malaguzzi is shown to be strong on two components that Aristotle and Dewey are weak on, respectively: moral-education methodology and moral motivation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.