Abstract
Environmental management schemes used today by companies promote marginal improvements from existing systems. We have compared the environmental reports presented by companies in the Swedish transport sector in relation to their carbon dioxide emissions, choice of indicators, and long-term goals. It is concluded that these reports cannot be used for benchmarking, nor for useful ranking of performance. The supply chain structure of the transport sector creates a problem with assigning the liability for carbon dioxide emission along the chain. The dramatic changes required by the transport sector in connection with climate change indicate that marginal improvements have to be assessed regarding long-term sustainability criteria. Comparing the situation of the transport companies to the criteria for applying backcasting we find that companies in the sector are well suited for using backcasting as a tool for strategy development. It is suggested that explicit contractual agreements of CO 2 performance of transport services are used to increase awareness and responsibility. Further it is suggested that integrated supply chain backcasting may be attempted as a way to identify efficient long-term strategies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.