Abstract

Ficus species are characterized by their unusual enclosed inflorescences (figs) and their relationship with obligate pollinator fig wasps (Agaonidae). Fig trees have a variety of growth forms, but true epiphytes are rare, and one example is Ficus deltoidea of Southeast Asia. Presumably as an adaptation to epiphytism, inflorescence design in this species is exceptional, with very few flowers in female (seed‐producing) figs and unusually large seeds. Figs on male (pollinator offspring‐generating) trees have many more flowers. Many fig wasps pollinate one fig each, but because of the low number of flowers per fig, efficient utilization by F. deltoidea's pollinators depends on pollinators entering several female figs. We hypothesized that it is in the interest of the plants to allow pollinators to re‐emerge from figs on both male and female trees and that selection favors pollinator roaming because it increases their own reproductive success. Our manipulations of Blastophaga sp. pollinators in a Malaysian oil palm plantation confirmed that individual pollinators do routinely enter several figs of both sexes. Entering additional figs generated more seeds per pollinator on female trees and more pollinator offspring on male trees. Offspring sex ratios in subsequently entered figs were often less female‐biased than in the first figs they entered, which reduced their immediate value to male trees because only female offspring carry their pollen. Small numbers of large seeds in female figs of epiphytic F. deltoidea may reflect constraints on overall female fig size, because pollinator exploitation depends on mutual mimicry between male and female figs.

Highlights

  • Many plant families are characterized by the way their flowers are grouped together into inflorescences

  • The behavior of any animals responsible for the dispersal of the seeds may have a significant influence on inflorescence design, because the size and location of inflorescences largely determine infructescence characteristics and which animals are attracted to them (Fleming & Kress, 2011)

  • Will natural selection favor pollinator re-­emergence. It can only take place on male trees because that is where the fig wasps can successfully reproduce, but its effects can provide vicariant benefits for the female trees, as is the case with the apparent mutual mimicry in attractant volatile production by male and female figs (Grafen & Godfray, 1991). This is analogous to the selection for active pollen dispersal in female figs of other Ficus species, which occurs despite the behavior being of no benefit to the individual foundresses (Raja et al, 2008a)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Many plant families are characterized by the way their flowers are grouped together into inflorescences. It can only take place on male trees because that is where the fig wasps can successfully reproduce, but its effects can provide vicariant benefits for the female trees, as is the case with the apparent mutual mimicry in attractant volatile production by male and female figs (Grafen & Godfray, 1991) This is analogous to the selection for active pollen dispersal in female figs of other Ficus species, which occurs despite the behavior being of no benefit to the individual foundresses (Raja et al, 2008a). The specific questions we asked were (1) Do foundresses re-­emerge from figs and do rates of emergence differ between male and female figs? (2) How many figs can a single foundress enter? (3) How many seeds are generated in female figs and do pollination rates per fig decline when a foundress enters additional figs? And (4) How many offspring do foundresses generate in their first and subsequent male figs, do females that re-­emerge produce more offspring, and do their offspring sex ratios change?

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
| CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call