7-days of FREE Audio papers, translation & more with Prime
7-days of FREE Prime access
7-days of FREE Audio papers, translation & more with Prime
7-days of FREE Prime access
https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2024.2311894
Copy DOIJournal: Territory, Politics, Governance | Publication Date: Feb 27, 2024 |
Citations: 1 | License type: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 |
ABSTRACT How does an island become a carceral space? How does islandness shift between openness and foreclosure? Border geographers have engaged carcerality as a relational and expansive quality. Islands figure prominently in these discussions. Although scholars have denaturalised islands as carceral spaces, the unstable character of islandness remains undertheorised in border studies and carceral geography. Building on qualitative research conducted in the Canary Islands in 2021, this paper bridges literature from carceral geography and island studies to argue that apprehending carcerality on islands obliges us to engage with islandness as a non-static process. Islands embody a tension between foreclosure and openness and thus there is a possibility that borders might emerge, thicken, move but also deflate and fade away. Containment on islands thus assumes four qualities: it is manufactured, it is multiscalar, it is racialized and it is fundamentally dynamic.
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.