Abstract

In their article, HHS/CDC Legal Response to Outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome [SARS], Misrahi, et al. (1) describe the updated federal laws and response plans for handling SARS and related communicable diseases. Federal authority is important to control the interstate and international movement of persons who are potentially infectious, but most isolation and quarantine orders will be performed by state and local officials, using state and local law. We discuss how existing laws might be modified to facilitate effective SARS control while providing legal protections to restricted persons.

Highlights

  • In their article, HHS/CDC Legal Response to Outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Misrahi, et al (1) describe the updated federal laws and response plans for handling SARS and related communicable diseases

  • Traditional Powers The drafters of the U.S Constitution gave states broad powers to control communicable diseases because the colonies were ridden with malaria, yellow fever (2), cholera, and typhoid

  • Public health orders get the most permissive judicial review, the rational relationship test, because they are based on objective criteria, are usually of limited duration, and are necessary to prevent imminent harm (9)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

HHS/CDC Legal Response to Outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Misrahi, et al (1) describe the updated federal laws and response plans for handling SARS and related communicable diseases. This public health authority has been upheld by the U.S Supreme Court in all cases (4), except when it is was clearly a subterfuge for racial discrimination (5), and in 1950, every state and local health department had clear powers to conduct case-finding and isolate or quarantine persons who represented a potential public health risk (6). State public health laws do not need to be detailed and specific, but they can give public health agencies the general authority to protect the public’s health and safety. Consistent with the Constitution, courts allow government agencies to fill in the details of these laws (7).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.