Abstract

Abstract This paper explores some central premises of Michel de Certeau's work, in particular Western imperialist historiography—the writing that not only conquers but also results in the scriptural occultation of its other. It traces de Certeau's discussion of the discursive formation of this writing, but only, like de Certeau, to demonstrate how unstable such a formation is, despite its supposition to the contrary. In other words, the occulted other, dominated but not vanquished, returns in the repressed of such writing. Finally, through a discussion of de Certeau's notions of ‘place’ /'space’, and ‘strategy’ /'tactics’, I hope to make some connections between de Certeau's work and post‐colonial criticisms.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.