Abstract

In Heidegger’s last seminar, which was in Zähringen in 1973, he introduces what he called a “phenomenology of the inconspicuous” (Phänomenologie des Unscheinbaren). Despite scholars’ occasional references to this “approach” over the last 40 years, this approach of Heidegger’s has gone largely under investigated in secondary literature. This article introduces three different, although not necessarily conflicting ways in which these sparse references to inconspicuousness can be interpreted: (1) The a priori of appearance can never be brought to manifestation, and the unscheinbar (inconspicuous) is interwoven with the scheinbar (appearing) as an active characteristic or form of “hiddenness” (Λήθη), therefore making inconspicuousness inherent within all phenomenology. (2) Or, there is now a particular step or reduction within phenomenology that involves one’s being attuned to the various modes of potential hiddenness (Verborgenheit and its cognates), of which “inconspicuousness” is a particular character trait. Or (3) there are particular, unique, and specific phenomena that give themselves “inconspicuously,” and there is also thus a corresponding, particular phenomenology in which one must engage in order to gain some kind of access to these specific things’ phenomenal strata. This paper introduces Heidegger’s “phenomenology of the inconspicuous” most especially in his last seminar in Zähringen in 1973, engages related references to unscheinbar in his 1942/1943 Seminar on Parmenides, and then puts forward an interpretation of what these somewhat ambiguous references could mean when contextualized according to Heidegger’s overall interests. This essay brings these references to light, and puts forward a proposal as to what kind of phenomenology Heidegger was–somewhat inconspicuously–referring.

Highlights

  • A Phenomenology of the “Inconspicuous” is a means of investigating and subsequently experiencing phenomena whose intelligibilities oscillate between both presence and absence

  • In Heidegger’s last seminar, which was in Zahringen in 1973, he introduces what he called a “phenomenology of the inconspicuous” (Phänomenologie des Unscheinbaren)

  • This paper introduces Heidegger’s “phenomenology of the inconspicuous” most especially in his last seminar in Zahringen in 1973, engages related references to unscheinbar in his 1942/1943 Seminar on Parmenides, and puts forward an interpretation of what these somewhat ambiguous references could mean when contextualized according to Heidegger’s overall interests

Read more

Summary

Inconspicuousness in the 1973 Zðhringen seminar

Often inspired by an interest in synthesizing Heraclitus’ emphasis on becoming with Parminides’ ontological “it is,” Heidegger emphasized how, as Dreyfus put it, there is a uniquely “saving power of insignificant things,” namely those that resist technological “machination.” Things that hold strata of ordinariness are not necessarily “insignificant” (as some have translated unscheinbar) in the sense that they utterly lack a significatory process, but rather do not draw immediate attention within conscious experience. In Heidegger’s seminars the dimension of lethe (Λήθη) is conceived as an a priori aspect of unconcealment as it already contains within itself laden aspects of concealment (e.g. withdrawal) Heidegger makes this explicit: “The essential form of unconcealment, [the active Unverborgenheit]...in a certain way retains within itself concealment [Verborgeneheit] and concealment [the passive Verbergung] and even must do so.” Some variations of concealment are at work always already in unconcealment in order for unconcealment to be properly unconcealment as such. The uncanny does not appear and withdraw, but it does so in a way that subverts our entire knowledge and understanding of visibility and how appearance works: The uncanny “itself in its essence is the inconspicuous, the simple, the insignificant, which shines in all beings.” surprising, the inconspicuous “,” despite its having the trait (Zug) to “not shine,” gives itself in all beings It is this peculiar ability that makes what is familiar and ordinary to appear in an unimpressive and homely manner.

Forms of presence and the Zðhringen seminar
Three interpretations
The inconspicuousness of Heidegger
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.