Abstract

Since 1996, the Netherlands has adopted a flood risk management policy based on making more room for the rivers. Currently, the focus in flood risk management is being adapted again, in view of increasing societal vulnerability and foreseeable effects of climate change. In this context, the choice between making more room for the river and/or strengthening embankments is again of major concern. This calls for further quantification of the effectiveness, costs and benefits of all possible measures. Making room for rivers was originally advocated by referring to a reduction of the probability of failure of the embankments and a reduction of the consequences in case of breaching. These arguments still apply, but the effect of making more room for rivers on flood risk has never been properly quantified yet. In this paper we identify three potential risk reducing effects, and quantify their effect for along the Rhine and Meuse Rivers in the Netherlands. We show that lowering the flood levels means smaller flood probabilities, that larger floodplain surface area significantly influences the relationship between discharge and flood level, and that lower flood levels in the river translate into smaller flooding depths and/or flood extent, and thus reduce the consequences of flooding.

Highlights

  • In the 1990s, the Netherlands experienced two major ÀRRGV ZLWKLQ D IHZ \HDUV 'HFHPEHU DQG -DQXDU\ 7KH ÀRRGV WULJJHUHG ERWK D UDSLG UHLQIRUFHPHQW RI the existing embankments and a policy change with UHVSHFW WR GHDOLQJ ZLWK ULYHU ÀRRGV, i.e. by giving room to the river

  • Reinforcement of the embankments was implemented after many years of opposition and debate about whether or not and how to reinforce the embankments, as earlier reinforcements had caused large impacts to highly valued natural and cultural landscape features

  • Giving room to the river avoids the need to strengthen the embankments, or at least decreases the magnitude of the required reinforcement

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the 1990s, the Netherlands experienced two major ÀRRGV ZLWKLQ D IHZ \HDUV 'HFHPEHU DQG -DQXDU\ 7KH ÀRRGV WULJJHUHG ERWK D UDSLG UHLQIRUFHPHQW RI the existing embankments and a policy change with UHVSHFW WR GHDOLQJ ZLWK ULYHU ÀRRGV, i.e. by giving room to the river. One of those regional sub-programmes was the Delta Programme on Rivers (DPR) The aim of this sub-programme was to develop a long-term strategy to ensure adequate flood risk management in the areas that can be flooded from the major rivers in the Netherlands, while taking into account the updated protection standards, climate change and socio-economic developments. In case the river is given more floodplain surface area (by relocating embankments or making a bypass/floodway), the relationship between discharge and flood level (the Q-h relation) is influenced: the Q-h relation lowers and becomes less steep This means that any extra discharge volume translates into a smaller rise of the flood water level, which positively affects the probability of breaching of embankments, especially near or above design flood conditions. Lower water levels in the river translate into smaller flood depth and/or flood extent, and reduce the exposure and consequences of flooding

Aim
The Rhine and Meuse Rivers
Q-h relation
K UHODWLRQ LV ORRNHG DW LW EHFRPHV DSSDUHQW WKDW
Flood consequence reduction
Summary and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call