Abstract

BackgroundEducational intervention represents an essential element of care for cancer patients; while several single institutions develop their own patient education (PE) programs on cancer, little information is available on the effective existence of PE programs at the level of research and care institutes. In Italy such institutes - Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico - are appointed by the Ministry of Health, and 11 (Cancer Research & Care Istitute-CRCI) of the 48 are specific for cancer on the basis of specific requirements regarding cancer care, research and education. Therefore, they represent an ideal and homogeneous model through which to investigate PE policies and activities throughout the country. The objective of this study was to assess PE activities in Italian CRCI.MethodsWe carried out a survey on PE strategies and services through a questionnaire. Four key points were investigated: a) PE as a cancer care priority, b) activities that are routinely part of PE, c) real involvement of the patients, and d) involvement of healthcare workers in PE activities.ResultsMost CRCI (85 %) completed the survey. All reported having ongoing PE activities, and 4 of the 11 considered PE an institutional activity. More than 90 % of CRCI organize classes and prepare PE handouts, while other PE activities (e.g., Cancer Information Services, mutual support groups) are less frequently part of institutional PE programs. Patients are frequently involved in the organization and preparation of educational activities on the basis of their own needs. Various PE activities are carried out for caregivers in 8 (73 %) out of 11 institutes. Finally, health care workers have an active role in the organization of PE programs, although nurses take part in these activities in only half of CRCI and pharmacists are seldom included.ConclusionsThe information arising from our research constitutes a necessary framework to identify areas of development and to design new strategies and standards to disseminate the culture of PE. This may ultimately help and stimulate the establishment of institutional integrated PE programs, including policies and interventions that can benefit a significant proportion of cancer patients.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0962-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Educational intervention represents an essential element of care for cancer patients; while several single institutions develop their own patient education (PE) programs on cancer, little information is available on the effective existence of PE programs at the level of research and care institutes

  • Our survey aims to take a picture of the PE activities and processes in the cancer research and care institute (CRCI) through a PE questionnaire addressed to the Scientific Board Director

  • PE as a cancer-care priority in CRCI This point investigated whether PE is part of the mission of Italian Cancer Patient Education Group (ICPEG) based on the fact that the Scientific Board Director or their delegates coordinated PE institutional policies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Educational intervention represents an essential element of care for cancer patients; while several single institutions develop their own patient education (PE) programs on cancer, little information is available on the effective existence of PE programs at the level of research and care institutes. The evolution followed the transformations of the different sociocultural contexts and changes in the care of patients: some interesting overviews of the transformation in the different countries are reported in the literature [6] It is possible recognize at least three phases in the evolution of the PE concept over the last decades: a progressive major engagement of the patient in the healthcare organization and in the decision making process [7,8,9,10,11]; and, the complementary role of the caregiver in heath care, in particular for chronic disease, as cancer is considered [12].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call