Abstract
This article sheds new light on the usage constraints ofbe able to, by combining empirical evidence from theBritish National Corpus(BNC, Davies 2004–) with theoretical insights on the semantics–pragmatics interface. First, we show thatbe able todoes not, contrary to the general assumption, express only ‘ability’ but it shares most of the root meanings usually associated with the possibility modalscanandcould(Coates 1983: 124). The data analysis shows that what is called ‘opportunity’ in Depraetere & Reed's (2011) taxonomy is the most frequent meaning ofbe able to. We then turn to the notion of actualisation, which is often claimed to be the main distinguishing feature betweenbe able toandcan/could. The qualitative analysis of the BNC dataset provides the empirical evidence, lacking in previous research, for the claim that actualisation is indeed a defining property of the modal periphrastic form. Starting from a reassessment of the semantics–pragmatics interface in terms of a fourfold distinction, we argue that actualisation is a generalised conversational implicature and constitutes conventional pragmatic meaning (that is, conventional non-truth-conditional meaning).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.