Abstract

Those committed to a more generous and inclusive welfare state face a trilemma in devising policies to meet the double crisis: higher taxes are disliked, the poor are viewed with suspicion and effective, inclusive services demand higher spending. Mass services (NHS, education, pensions) are popular; benefits for the poor are not. Reforms which focus on child poverty, contributory welfare and poverty-level wages are more likely to be politically acceptable. Greater insecurity in a more flexible labour market and pressure for child and elder care and training and work-place rights to help cope with new social risks encourage support for better and more redistributive welfare. More accessible childcare and a bettertrained workforce can improve productivity. An inclusive, humane and generous welfare state is feasible, politically and economically. It requires commitment and political leadership.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call