Abstract

Many environmental regulations are designed to clean up the dirtiest firms. However, if pollution intensity is negatively correlated with market share, this approach may not be the most cost-effective way to reduce pollution. This paper illustrates the theoretical conditions under which it is more cost effective to incentivize pollution intensity improvements among relatively cleaner firms. I provide a decision rule for regulators designing pollution reduction policy, and I show that the California wholesale electricity sector exhibits investment behavior consistent with the trade-off implied by this rule.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call