Abstract
We cannot fully understand and improve global governance without understanding the process of negotiation in international organizations and other regimes. The strategies and tactics used by governments and official mediators partly determine whether negotiations end in impasse or agreement as well as the terms of agreements reached. A contrast between the World Trade Organization's negotiations in two recent cases, in 1999 and 2001, illustrates how variations in the negotiation process can shape regime rules, their evolution through time, and their legitimacy. This contrast reveals gaps in current regime literature and suggests five hypotheses for investigation in other regimes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
