Making a Case for Faculty Advisor–Advisee Concordant Pairs

Abstract

The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education Standards require schools and colleges of pharmacy to provide the needed resources for student success, including student advising. The faculty advisor’s role in schools and colleges of pharmacy can be varied and may include modeling professional behavior, serving as students’ advocate, and providing academic and professional guidance. This is especially important upon students entering pharmacy school when the risk of being overwhelmed has been documented. Various factors, including geographic distance from home, professional identity formation, and anxiety over career trajectory have been challenges to their perceived well-being. As in all human interactions, we believe that successful advisor/mentor-student relationships are more likely to develop if there is a deeper personal connection—some element(s) of shared demographic background—in addition to complementary professional, educational, or research backgrounds of the faculty advisor. Pharmacy students in Chinese and American universities and those in other health care disciplines have rated very highly their perceived value of the supporting role of the faculty advisor; hence, we postulated that using this criterion when matching faculty advisor–student pairs may produce better outcomes. In this commentary, we propose expanded criteria including demographics for producing faculty advisor–advisee concordant (or nearly so) pairs mindfully and strategically in a standardized stepwise process of advising aimed at facilitating success for students of all backgrounds, with the goal of promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion and the ultimate attendant benefits to patient care.