Abstract

Supporting students’ active participation in maker-centered project-based learning (PBL) can be challenging in inclusive classes. The aim of this study was to support students’ active participation in cooperative team via teacher-directed reflective discussions during an inclusive, maker-centered PBL unit. The study was conducted during the students’ final year of primary school. In the context of 44 students’ inclusive class, the study focused on a team of 11 students (4 girls, 7 boys; aged 12 – 13 years) who worked in pairs and had their own differentiated responsibility areas (e.g. interior designers had interior design and lighting responsibilities) in the construction of a scale-model house. Because students in PBL need support in their learning, reflective discussions were organized after each lesson to ensure students’ participation. Reflective discussions were video recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a content and co-occurrence network analysis. The analysis revealed that teacher-directed reflective discussions first focused on supporting the cooperation of all students and then ensured the continuity of the process with most of the pairs. Some pairs, consisting of students with learning difficulties, needed intensified support until they could actively participate. The results indicate that teacher-directed reflective discussions improve students’ cooperation skills and promote participation. A carefully prepared group composition enables the teacher to give intensified support to those students who need it most. In light of the results, we recommend that teachers focus on group composition when preparing inclusive, maker-centered PBL projects and use reflective discussions during said projects to promote inclusion and support students’ active participation.

Highlights

  • In the past decade, there has been considerable research regarding the approaches of students in terms of learning together and constructing competences throughElectronic supplementary material The online version of this article contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.engagement

  • Based on our literature review, we suggest that in inclusive classes, maker-centered project-based learning (PBL) projects are convenient because they are adaptable to different kinds of learners and provide a structure in which the teacher can differentiate the learning process and/ or the act of creation (Alper, 2013; Bell, 2002; Brigham et al, 2011; Lee & So, 2015; Martinez & Stager, 2013)

  • Some learning difficulties (LD) students were separated from other students in the team

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In project-based learning (PBL), students engage in scientific and engineering practices when constructing an artifact together (Blumenfeld, Soloway, Marx, Krajcik, Guzdial, & Palincsar, 1991; Krajick & Merritt, 2012), and in maker activities, students learn while they make, tinker with, or engineer something shareable (Martinez & Stager, 2013). This type of learning is considered useful to prepare students for the twenty-first century (Binkley, Erstad, Herman, Raizen, Ripley, Miller-Ricci, & Rumble, 2012). They gain cooperative skills in addition to academic knowledge (Johnson & Johnson, 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call