Major plant communities of the Marakele National Park

P.J Van Staden,G.J Bredenkamp

doi:10.4102/koedoe.v48i2.101

P.J Van Staden, G.J Bredenkamp

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v48i2.101

Copy DOI

Abstract

To manage and conserve any national park efficiently, a profound knowledge of the ecology is a prerequisite, and to achieve that an inventory of the biotic and abiotic components must be undertaken. As a contribution to such a program this information was collected for Marakele National Park. The study area covers 290.51 km² in the southwestern part of the Limpopo Province. The underlying parent rock of the study area is sandstone, shale and mudstone with several diabase dykes. The soils range from shallow to deep sandy soils on sandstone and clayey soils on diabase and mudstone. The rainfall varies from 556 mm to 630 mm per annum, mainly during the summer months. The study area experiences warm summers with temperatures of up to 32 ºC and cool, dry winters with frost in the low-lying areas. The vegetation of the study area was classified in a hierarchical, plant sociological system by using TWINSPAN and the Braun - Blanquet technique. The floristic data from 130 relevés were classified to identify five major plant communities, namely one forest community, three savanna/grassland communities and one wetland community. These plant communities were ecologically interpreted by habitat.The phytosociological table was condensed to a synoptic table to describe the major plant communities.

Highlights

The primary objective when proclaiming a national park is to conserve parts of pristine natural ecosystems for future generations (Gertenbach 1987)
The vegetation composition of the study area is summarised in a synoptic table (Table 1)
The vegetation of the study area was classified in a hierarchical, plant sociological system by using the Braun- Blanquet technique

Summary

Introduction

The primary objective when proclaiming a national park is to conserve parts of pristine natural ecosystems for future generations (Gertenbach 1987). In order to manage and conserve any conservation area, a profound knowledge of the ecology is a prerequisite, and to achieve that prerequisite, an inventory of the biotic and the abiotic components of that national park must be undertaken (Edwards 1972). Management recommendations can only be made on the basis of interpreted ecological knowledge to restore the balance of the original natural system. The influence of management recommendations on the system must be regularly monitored to determine if the aims that were set have been achieved satisfactorily. Efficient monitoring systems depend upon an inventory of the biotic and abiotic components (Gertenbach 1987)

Objectives

Results

Conclusion