Abstract
Many pitfalls result from the limited ability of Doppler instruments to record low flow velocities. These include a misleading resistance or pulsatility index due to diastolic cut-off and taking no signal to equal no flow assuming that no signal means no flow. Comparison of actual flow velocities as measured in an in-vitro system (range: 0.8 to 3.4 cm/s) with the lowest recordable spectral or colour signals in 3 Duplexscanners showed that reduced sensitivity to low flow velocities is not only dependent on the high pass ("wall") filter setting, Doppler frequency or angle of incidence, but also on factors such as vessel diameter, impairing the signal to noise ratio. Characteristic errors of colour flow mapping (misleading vascular anatomy, imitation of pathological findings, erroneous exclusion of flow) are due to partial volume effect, limited temporal and velocity resolution, changing angle of incidence, aliasing and failure to detect low flow velocities.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
