Abstract

Regresssive models were used to search for possible major gene effects on pulmonary function in two groups of families: one ascertained through patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD defined as forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1) < 70% forced vital capacity (FVC)] and the other ascertained through patients with non-pulmonary disorders. There were 85 COPD families with data on 270 individuals and 56 non-pulmonary families with data on 199 individuals. The analysis was done on residuals obtained from a regression of FEV, on age, sex, race, height, and ascertainment group. Smoking status was incorporated directly as a covariate in the regressive models. Data on probands were excluded in this analysis as a partial correction for ascertainment bias. The best fitting model for the 85 COPD families included a major gene effect with sex specific variances, but no residual familial correlation. The best fitting model for the non-pulmonary families was one with no major gene effect and no residual familial correlation. Cigarette smoking was a significant covariate in both groups of families. Testing for heterogeneity showed a significant difference in the control of pulmonary function among these COPD and non-pulmonary families ( ξ 2 = 20.12 on 6 df; p = 0.0026). Major gene effects appear to be limited to these COPD families, while there was no evidence for major gene effects in the non-pulmonary families.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.