Abstract
Many cultural phenomena evolve through a Darwinian process whereby adaptive variants are selected and spread at the expense of competing variants. While cultural evolutionary theory emphasises the importance of social learning to this process, experimental studies indicate that people’s dominant response is to maintain their prior behaviour. In addition, while payoff-biased learning is crucial to Darwinian cultural evolution, learner behaviour is not always guided by variant payoffs. Here, we use agent-based modelling to investigate the role of maintenance in Darwinian cultural evolution. We vary the degree to which learner behaviour is payoff-biased (i.e., based on critical evaluation of variant payoffs), and compare three uncritical (non-payoff-biased) strategies that are used alongside payoff-biased learning: copying others, innovating new variants, and maintaining prior variants. In line with previous research, we show that some level of payoff-biased learning is crucial for populations to converge on adaptive cultural variants. Importantly, when combined with payoff-biased learning, uncritical maintenance leads to stronger population-level adaptation than uncritical copying or innovation, highlighting the importance of maintenance to cultural selection. This advantage of maintenance as a default learning strategy may help explain why it is a common human behaviour.
Highlights
Many cultural phenomena evolve through a Darwinian process whereby adaptive variants are selected and spread at the expense of competing variants
Asocial learning can be considered payoff-biased, in the sense that it involves switching between innovation and maintenance based on variant payoffs
In line with previous research, we show that some level of payoff-biased learning is crucial for populations to converge on adaptive variants
Summary
Many cultural phenomena evolve through a Darwinian process whereby adaptive variants are selected and spread at the expense of competing variants. When combined with payoff-biased learning, uncritical maintenance leads to stronger population-level adaptation than uncritical copying or innovation, highlighting the importance of maintenance to cultural selection This advantage of maintenance as a default learning strategy may help explain why it is a common human behaviour. Small groups of human participants produce material or symbolic artefacts such as stone tools12, arrowheads[13,14,15], paper planes[16,17] and communication systems[18,19,20] that adaptively improve over time When learning in these studies, and in general, people can switch between three basic strategies: they can copy a variant from someone else (copying), innovate a new variant (innovation), or reuse a prior variant (maintenance). There is evidence that people do not always evaluate variant payoffs, declining
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.