Abstract
ABSTRACTThe increasing complexity of shipboard equipment is often cited as a cause of maintenance problems and poor material readiness. This paper focuses on the extent to which alternative personnel assignment policies might alleviate these difficulties. Regression analysis is applied to 91 Cruiser/Destroyer type ships. Their material condition, as measured by Mission Degrading (CASREP) Downtime, is examined as a function of the type of equipment on‐board and the characteristics of maintenance personnel responsible for the equipment. The analysis is performed for men in each of six ratings. It is found that more complex equipment suffers far more downtime than less complex equipment. It is also found that higher quality personnel are often better at keeping complex equipment in good material condition. Quantitative estimates of the payoff to reassigning high‐quality personnel to ships with complex equipment are derived.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
