Mainstream partial denitrification‐anammox in sand and expanded clay deep‐bed polishing filters under practical loading rates and backwashing conditions

Abstract

AbstractThis study focused on evaluating the feasibility of expanded clay and sand as media types for mainstream partial denitrification‐anammox (PdNA) in deep‐bed single‐media polishing filters under nitrogen and solids loading rates as well as backwash conditions similar to conventional denitrification filters. The surface roughness and iron content of the expanded clay were hypothesized to allow for enhanced anammox retention, nitrogen removal rates, and runtimes. However, under the tested loading rates and backwash conditions, no clear benefit of expanded clay was observed compared with conventional sand. This study showed the feasibility of PdNA in filters with both sand and expanded clay with PdN efficiencies of 76% and 77%, PdNA rates of 840 and 843 g N/m3/d and TIN removal rates of 960 and 964 g N/m3/d, respectively. Glycerol demands were 1.5–1.6 g COD added per g TIN removed, thus indicating potential carbon savings up to 75% compared with conventional denitrification. Overall, this study showed for the first time PdNA filters performing at nitrogen removal rates double that of previous PdNA studies under realistic conditions while providing insights into the media choice and backwashing conditions. Future research on expanded clay backwash conditions is needed to provide its full potential in PdNA filters.Practitioner Points Hydraulic and TSS loading rates similar to conventional denitrification can be applied in PdNA filters. Conventional sand can be used when retrofitting conventional denitrification filters into PdNA filters. Carbon savings up to 75% can be achieved with glycerol when retrofitting conventional filters into PdNA filters