Abstract

Abstract. Data from a cluster of three THEMIS (Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms) spacecraft during February–March 2009 frequently provide an opportunity to construct local data-adaptive magnetospheric models, which are suitable for the accurate mapping along the magnetic field lines at distances of 6–9 Re in the nightside magnetosphere. This allows us to map the isotropy boundaries (IBs) of 30 and 80 keV protons observed by low-altitude NOAA POES (Polar Orbiting Environmental Satellites) to the equatorial magnetosphere (to find the projected isotropy boundary, PIB) and study the magnetospheric conditions, particularly to evaluate the ratio KIB (Rc/rc; the magnetic field curvature radius to the particle gyroradius) in the neutral sheet at that point. Special care is taken to control the factors which influence the accuracy of the adaptive models and mapping. Data indicate that better accuracy of an adaptive model is achieved when the PIB distance from the closest spacecraft is as small as 1–2 Re. For this group of most accurate predictions, the spread of KIB values is still large (from 4 to 32), with the median value KIB ~13 being larger than the critical value Kcr ~ 8 expected at the inner boundary of nonadiabatic angular scattering in the current sheet. It appears that two different mechanisms may contribute to form the isotropy boundary. The group with K ~ [4,12] is most likely formed by current sheet scattering, whereas the group having KIB ~ [12,32] could be formed by the resonant scattering of low-energy protons by the electromagnetic ion-cyclotron (EMIC) waves. The energy dependence of the upper K limit and close proximity of the latter event to the plasmapause locations support this conclusion. We also discuss other reasons why the K ~ 8 criterion for isotropization may fail to work, as well as a possible relationship between the two scattering mechanisms.

Highlights

  • Adiabatic motion of charged particles in the trap geometry of the geomagnetic field conserves the empty atmospheric loss cone in the particle distributions

  • The group with K ∼ [4, 12] is most likely formed by current sheet scattering, whereas the group having KIB ∼ [12, 32] could be formed by the resonant scattering of low-energy protons by the electromagnetic ion-cyclotron (EMIC) waves

  • In many cases the K values are shifted considerably to high values compared to the K = 8 value, predicted by the current sheet scattering (CSS) mechanism

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Adiabatic motion of charged particles in the trap geometry of the geomagnetic field conserves the empty atmospheric loss cone in the particle distributions. Sergeev et al (2015) presented a statistical survey of the IB morphology on the nightside They identified a few morphological features (such as frequent occurrence of coincident IBs in 30 and 80 keV proton energy channels, frequent multiple dropouts of precipitated to trapped flux ratio near the IB location, and observations of newly emerging isotropic precipitation equatorward of the previous IB) which are inconsistent with a simple CSS-based model but can be explained in terms of a wave–particle interaction mechanism. These results put a question mark over the roles of the CSS and wave mechanisms in forming the proton isotropy boundary. We construct adaptive models for these events, analyze the K values in about 50 such conjunctions and discuss the implications concerning the mechanism which is responsible for the formation of the proton isotropy boundaries

Observations
Adaptive models and control of the model accuracy
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call