Abstract
Numerous attempts have been made to explain the anomalous magnetic properties of chromites and of mixed spinels containing chromium on the basis of the theoretical models of Néel and of Yafet and Kittel. Recent calculations by T. A. Kaplan and co-workers, using a classical Heisenberg model, have shown that over an appreciable range of the ratio of the BB to the AB interaction, the ground state is a ferrimagnetic spiral, i.e., a conical spin configuration in which the transverse components progress in spiral fashion along a fixed direction in the crystal. The object of the present study is to determine the suitability of the various proposed theoretical models in the case of manganese chromite, for which rather complex magnetic behavior has been observed by means of neutron diffraction. From diffraction patterns taken at room temperature, it is readily established that MnCr2O4 is a normal spinel with less than 1% of the Mn2+ ions present on B sites. The Curie temperature, as determined from diffraction data is ∼43°K. Below this temperature the magnetic contributions to the fundamental spinel peaks arising from aligned spins increases as the temperature is lowered and is effectively saturated at about 20°K. At 18°K, additional sharp peaks appear at positions which cannot be indexed either on the original unit cell or on any reasonably enlarged cell. These extra reflections persist with unchanged intensities down to 4.2°K. No change in either the positions or intensities of the fundamental lines is observed in going through the transition. Above 18°K a broad, diffuse peak is present in the region where the principal extra lines develop. This diffuse peak decreases with increasing temperature, but is still observable above the Curie point. Application of a magnetic field along the neutron scattering vector decreases the magnetic contributions to the fundamentals, but increases the intensities of the extra reflections. Analysis of the data shows that while little difficulty is encountered in explaining the observed saturation moments, the Néel model and the Yafet—Kittel model fail to account for major qualitative features of the diffraction results. Agreement is not significantly improved by modifications of the Néel model in which reversed spins (either random or ordered) are introduced, or in which some of the spins remain paramagnetic even at low temperatures. On the other hand, all the qualitative aspects of the diffraction results can be explained in terms of the ferrimagnetic spiral model of Kaplan and co-workers. The theoretical calculations give reasonably good quantitative agreement with the positions and intensities of the extra lines as well as the intensities of the fundamentals, while retaining the expected values for the individual ionic moments and the macroscopic saturation moment. Although some discrepancies still remain, there is every reason to believe that these can be removed by further refinement of the theory and by the extension of experimental measurements to single crystals.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.