Magnetic resonance imaging in polymyalgia rheumatica-contrast enhancement is not always needed.

Abstract

Extracapsular inflammation at entheseal sites in the pelvic girdle as demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was shown to be useful as an additional tool for diagnosing polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). However, it is unclear whether MRI needs to be performed with contrast enhancement or whether oedema-sensitive sequences are sufficient. To evaluate the performance of T2w TIRM (turbo inversion recovery magnitude) imaging compared to fat-saturated contrast-enhanced (ce) T1w at predefined pelvic sites to detect extracapsular inflammation in patients with PMR. A total of 120 pelvic MRIs of patients with pelvic girdle pain, 40with clinically diagnosed PMR and 80controls, were retrospectively scored by three blinded radiologists separately evaluating the MRI with and without contrast enhancement at 19previously defined pelvic structures. The intra- and interrater reliability and the diagnostic performance of both techniques were statistically analysed and evaluated. The detection of inflammatory MRI signals correlated moderately between both techniques (Cohen'sκ 0.583). With ceT1w imaging 20.7% more sites were detected as inflamed compared to T2w TIRM in PMR patients. Inter- and intrareader reliability was superior with ceT1w imaging. If the inflammatory signal was detected at three sites bilaterally including the origin of the rectus femoris muscle or adductor longus muscle, the sensitivity and specificity was 100% and 97.1% by ceT1w imaging vs. 80.8% and 93.3% by T2w TIRM, respectively. Contrast enhancement is superior to oedema-sensitive MRI in the detection of extracapsular inflammation in PMR. However, using T2w TIRM also detects many but not all PMR cases.