Abstract

Superconducting high field magnets are tightly constrained in terms of field quality, since such magnets are usually designed to perform quite demanding tasks, such as focusing particle beams in accelerators, plasma confinement and shaping in fusion devices, and polarizing actions in magnetic resonance. In all these cases, small discrepancies of field map from the design values may strongly impact on device performance. As a consequence, quality insurance procedures are needed to verify if each single coil meets such criteria, e.g., using laser tracking, and possibly warm magnetic measurements. As a matter of fact, external magnetic measurements can be used to estimate the possible deformations of conductors inside the magnet, but this implies inverse problem approaches. The field probes accuracy is therefore critical, and the measurement system must be carefully designed, taking into account the probe characteristics, but also the characteristics of the windings and of the surrounding environment. In this paper, different measurement techniques are compared in terms of sensitivity and accuracy, with reference to various types of sensors and of measurement schemes.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.