Magnetic fabric in carbonatic rocks from thrust shear zones

Abstract

<p><strong> </strong></p><p>The aim of this study is to investigate how structural deformation in shear zones is documented by the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS). The study area is located in the Pliocene outer thrust of the Northern Apennines, which involved Cretaceous to Neogene calcareous and marly rocks. Here, brittle-ductile tectonites show different characteristics along two differently oriented thrust ramps: the NNE-SSW-trending oblique thrust ramp is characterized by the presence of S tectonites, while the NW-SE-trending frontal ramp is characterized by the presence of SC tectonites.</p><p>Samples for AMS fabric investigation were collected on shear zones from three sectors of the belt, at different distance from the main thrust to detect possible magnetic fabric variations. The three study area are characterized by different combinations of simple and pure shear, thus different degree of non-coaxiality, which has been quantified through the vorticity number W<sub>k</sub>.</p><p>Specimens were measured with an AGICO KLY-3 Kappabridge at the CIMaN-ALP Laboratory (Italy) on 15 different directions mode. Only measurements with all three F-statistics of the anisotropy tests higher than 5 were accepted as reliable. Moreover, outliers characterized by ± 2σ difference with respect to the mean value of AMS scalar parameters were excluded from further analysis. In order to distinguish groups of specimens affected by different sedimentary or tectonic processes, we identified clusters of AMS scalar parameters; when clusters were not defined by these parameters, we applied a combination of contouring and cluster analysis on each principal axis to identify different subfabrics.</p><p>The magnetic fabric revealed straightforward correlations with structural data and specific changes of AMS axis orientation depending upon the increasing of deformation (lower vorticity number) and proximity to the main thrust. Similar evolution was detected in different deformation regimes. Overall, the magnetic fabric is more sensitive to the simple shear deformation, as the magnetic lineation tends to parallelize mostly with the computed slip vector; however in pure-shear dominated regimes, the magnetic lineation becomes parallel to the transport direction when the deformation is really intense (sites at less than 15-30 cm from the thrust plane).</p><p>The applied combination of density diagrams and cluster analysis on AMS data successfully allowed discriminating subfabrics related to different events, and shows a great potential to unravel mixed sedimentary and/or tectonic features in magnetic fabrics.</p>