Abstract

The Chang’an Au deposit is a large Au deposit located in the south of the Ailaoshan-Red River tectonic zone, southwestern margin of the South China block. The deposit exhibit characters similar to Carlin-type Au deposits in Nevada and Dian-Qian-Gui “Golden Triangle”, including tectonic evolution (deformed and rifted cratonic margins), orebody controlled by lithology and structure and invisible Au ionically bound in arsenian pyrite and pyrite. Mineralization is controlled by a strike-slip fault and occurs as barren milky quartz veins, disseminated gold-bearing pyrite and arsenopyrite in the Early Paleozoic sandstone, siltstone and limestone. Gold is invisibly and ionically bound in arsenopyrite and pyrite or locally occurs as isolated native gold crystals (micron scale). Wall rock alteration includes sulfide, silicic, sericite and decarbonized alterations. Three hydrothermal mineralizing stages (I, II, III) can be identified: milky quartz-pyrite (I), quartz-sericite-pyrite-arsenopyrite (II) and dolomite-calcite-quartz (III). Different from those deposit in Dian-Qian-Gui, numerous plutons intruded in and around the mine. The syenite dikes are pyritized, thus, formed prior to the mineralization while lamprophyre dikes are unaltered and crosscut by the syenite dikes. The syenite dikes yielded zircon U − Pb ages of ca. 35.8 Ma and the lamprophyre yielded similar Ar-Ar age of ca. 36.6 Ma, largely constraining the age of Au mineralization. In situ S–Pb isotopic compositions for ore pyrite and arsenopyrite were measured by fs-LA-MC-ICP-MS. Sulfides from Chang’an show a uniform range from –6.4‰ to + 4.6‰, a typical characteristic of magmatic-derived S. Such sulfur isotopic compositions are similar to those of sulfides from Carlin-type Au deposits, but different from those of sulfides from orogenic-type deposit, which commonly exhibit a wide range of δ34S values. Pb isotopic ratios of pyrite and arsenopyrite are similar to those of the intrusive rocks in the deposit with more radiogenic Pb, suggesting that the metal is probably sourced from the coeval intrusive rocks and sedimentary wall rocks. Combined with the low Au concentrations of the sedimentary wall rocks, Au in the Chang’an deposit are probably sourced from the intrusive rocks. Differences between the Chang’an deposit and typical orogenic-type Au deposit include: (1) Orebodies in the Chang’an deposit exhibit transitional contact relationship with the host rocks and boundaries between them are defined by cut-off grade while these boundaries in typical orogenic-type deposits are clearly defined. (2) Sulfidized and decarbonized alterations are quite significant in the Chang’an deposit but commonly absent in typical orogenic-type deposits. (3) The Chang’an deposit have lower CO2 contents of ore-forming fluids and more shallow ore-forming depth relative to typical orogenic-type deposits. Based on the ore deposit geology, dating and isotopic data, the Chang’an mineralization is similar to typical Carlin-type gold deposit, formed by ore fluids originated from a deep magmatic S source in an post-collisional intracontinental setting at ca. 36 Ma.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call