Abstract

We have constrained syneruptive pressure-temperature-time (P-T-t) paths of mafic magmas using a combination of short-timescale cooling and decompression chronometers. Recent work has shown that the thermal histories of crystals in the last few seconds to hours of eruption can be constrained using concentration gradients of MgO inside olivine-hosted melt inclusions, produced in response to syneruptive cooling and crystallization of olivine on the inclusion walls. We have applied this technique to the study of melt inclusions erupted by arc and ocean island volcanoes, including the 1974 subplinian eruption of Fuego volcano; the 1977 fire-fountain eruption of Seguam volcano; and three eruptions of Kilauea volcano (episode 1 of the 1959 Kilauea Iki fire-fountain eruption, the 1500 CE vigorous fire-fountain eruption, and the 1650 CE subplinian eruption). Of the eruptions studied so far, melt inclusions from the 1959 Kilauea Iki eruption record the highest syneruptive cooling rates (3–11°C/s) and the shortest cooling durations (4–19 s), while inclusions from the 1974 Fuego eruption record the slowest cooling rates (0.1–1.7°C/s) and longest cooling durations (21–368 s). The high cooling rates inferred for the Kilauea Iki and Seguam fire fountain eruptions are consistent with air quenching over tens of seconds during and after fragmentation and eruption. Melt inclusions sampled from the interiors of small (∼6 cm diameter) volcanic bombs at Fuego are found to have cooled more slowly on average than inclusions sampled from ash (with particle diameters < 2 mm) during the same eruption, as expected based on conductive cooling models. We find evidence for a systematic relationship between cooling rates and decompression rates of magmas, in which rapidly ascending gas-bearing magmas experience slower cooling during ascent and eruption than slowly ascending magmas. Our magma P-T-t constraints for the Kilauea Iki eruption are in broad agreement with isentropic models that show that the dominant driver of cooling in the conduit is adiabatic expansion of a vapor phase; however, at Fuego and Seguam, our results suggest a significant role for latent heat production and/or open-system degassing (both of which violate assumptions required for isentropic ascent). We thereby caution against the application of isentropic conduit models to magmas containing relatively high initial water concentrations (e.g., arc magmas containing ∼4 wt% water). We note that several processes that have been inferred to occur in volcanic conduits such as magma stalling, magma mingling, open- and closed-system degassing, vapor fluxing, and vapor accumulation (in foam layers or as slugs of gas) are associated with different implied vapor volume fractions during syneruptive ascent. Given the sensitivity of magma P-T-t paths to vapor volume fraction, the syneruptive thermometer presented here may be a means of identifying these processes during the seconds to hours preceding the eruption of mafic magmas.

Highlights

  • The temperature of magma during ascent through the volcanic conduit exerts an important control on magma crystallinity and viscosity, which in turn affect magma rheology and ascent dynamics (Costa et al, 2007; Vona et al, 2011; Shea and Hammer, 2013; La Spina et al, 2016; Bamber et al, 2020)

  • Some of the Seguam inclusions (Seg4-MI1, Seg5-MI1, Seg6-MI1, and Seg7-MI1; see Supplementary Material) exhibit subtle hints of concave-up concentration gradients of MgO across their centers, which may reflect a period of heating prior to quenching on eruption. This would be consistent with the observation that these inclusions have melt compositions that are too primitive to be in equilibrium with their host olivine (Figure 2), which could be explained if they had undergone a small amount of post-entrapment melting prior to eruption

  • The concave-up MgO profiles could be a consequence of multicomponent diffusion effects (Saper and Stolper, 2020) or they could conceivably be an artifact of melt advection during growth of the large vapor bubbles observed in the majority of these inclusions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The temperature of magma during ascent through the volcanic conduit exerts an important control on magma crystallinity and viscosity, which in turn affect magma rheology and ascent dynamics (Costa et al, 2007; Vona et al, 2011; Shea and Hammer, 2013; La Spina et al, 2016; Bamber et al, 2020). If a parcel of magma ascends rapidly enough to prevent significant melt-vapor segregation and conduction of heat across the conduit walls, its ascent may closely follow an adiabatic path (i.e., the system is closed to transfer of heat and mass). If, this parcel of magma experiences minimal syneruptive crystallization, irreversible gas exsolution (Sahagian and Proussevitch, 1996), or viscous heating, its ascent may be considered approximately isentropic. Temperature changes expected during adiabatic ascent of magma along both isentropic and isenthalpic paths are considered in detail by Mastin and Ghiorso (2001)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call