Abstract
This article examines the state's mobilization of difference in meting out irrational violence through juxtaposing two filicidal cases, those of Andrea Yates and Sailaja Hathaway. Biological deviance in Andrea Yates's case and cultural difference in Sailaja Hathaway's case are used to administer retributive justice. However, in deciding on the cases of `mad' mothers, the state appears irrationally violent. First, ideas on what is culturally driven and psychotically driven behavior are arbitrary. And second, punishment is not proportional to crime. Yates killed her five children, but was declared innocent by reason of insanity, and is undergoing psychiatric treatment. Conversely, immigrant mother Hathaway's filicidal act did not have long-term physical effects on her two sons, yet she was sentenced to 15 years in prison. This article concludes that demarcating diasporic difference, through cultural testimony in Sailaja Hathaway's case in this instance, abets the state's classificatory and disciplinary functions while simultaneously concealing the state's maddening violence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
