Abstract

ABSTRACT In April 1793, after war erupted between France and England, President George Washington issued his so-called Neutrality proclamation declaring America’s intent to avoid involvement in the conflict. Writing as Pacificus, Alexander Hamilton produced a series of essays defending the proclamation and arguing that the Constitution gave the president broad discretion in foreign affairs. Responding as Helvidius, James Madison argued that Pacificus’ assertions threatened the constitutional separation of powers between Congress and the executive, and in fact the administration’s neutrality policy proved difficult to enforce. The Neutrality Proclamation is often see as a precedent for presidential dominance in matters of war and peace but, upon closer examination, it appears much more ambiguous.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.