Abstract
To characterize the response to antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment of macular neovascularization (MNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with subclinical angioid streaks (AS) during a 2-year follow-up. Retrospective, longitudinal, case-control, and multicentric study. Among a cohort of neovascular AMD population, we selected patients with subclinical AS and treatment-naïve MNV treated with anti-VEGF for a 2-year follow-up. An age- and sex-matched control group with treatment-naïve MNV secondary to AMD without subclinical AS was selected. Demographics and differences in treatment response (i.e., number of injections needed, anatomical and functional outcomes) between the two groups were analyzed. Among 102 eyes of 102 patients with neovascular AMD, 34 eyes of 34 patients (82 ± 6years old) were included in the subclinical AS group, whereas 68 eyes of 68 patients (81 ± 6years old, p = 0.342) in the control group. All eyes with subclinical AS presented RPD compared to 56% of eyes without subclinical AS (p < 0.001). During the 2-year follow-up, eyes with subclinical AS needed more injections (10.6 ± 3.2 vs 8.3 ± 3.1 injections for eyes with and without subclinical AS, respectively, p < 0.001). Visual acuity (VA) decreased during the treatment (from 0.53 ± 0.37 at the baseline to 0.69 ± 0.45 LogMAR at 2-year follow-up, p = 0.044) in eyes with subclinical AS; no VA changes were observed in the control group (p = 0.798). RPE atrophy at the end of the 2-year follow-up affected 74% of cases with subclinical AS and 29% of cases of the control group (p < 0.001). MNVs secondary to AMD with subclinical AS are characterized by worse functional and anatomical outcomes after 2-year anti-VEGF treatment compared to MNV secondary to AMD without subclinical AS, supporting the different pathophysiological mechanisms involved in this recently described AMD phenotype.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.