Abstract
Objective To evaluate macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in amblyopic eyes compared to the fellow eye. Design Cross-sectional study. Participants 30 patients (60 eyes) older than 18 years of age with amblyopia. Methods Inclusion criteria included individuals older than 18 years, amblyopia, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤20/40. A complete medical history was taken and an eye examination carried out. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was carried out on both eyes of all patients. Exclusion criteria included intraocular pressure (IOP) >23 mm Hg and eye pathology that may affect OCT measurements. The primary outcome measures were foveal thickness and average peripapillary RNFL thickness, which were compared using a paired t test. Quadrants in peripapillary scans and concentric rings in macular scans were analyzed. Results The average age was 56 years (range = 33–82 years). Visual acuity ranged from 20/40 to 20/4000 (mean = 20/275). The average peripapillary RNFL thickness was 90.6 μm (SD = 9.6 μm) in the amblyopic eye and 90.1 μm (SD = 12.1 μm) in the fellow eye ( p = 0.64). The average macular thickness in amblyopic eyes was 260.1 μm (SD = 32.0 μm), and 254.7 μm (SD = 32.5 μm) in fellow eyes ( p = 0.10). No statistical difference existed between peripapillary quadrants or macular concentric rings. These differences were smaller when the strabismic amblyopes were isolated. Conclusions There does not seem to be a difference in peripapillary RNFL or macular thickness between the amblyopic eye and fellow eye.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.