Macroscopic Examination of Multiple-Shot Cattle Heads-An Animal Welfare Due Diligence Tool for Abattoirs Using Penetrating Captive Bolt Devices?

Andrew Grist,Stephen Wotton,Toby G Knowles

doi:10.3390/ani9060328

Andrew Grist, Stephen Wotton + Show 1 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060328

Copy DOI

Abstract

Simple SummaryThe most common method of stunning cattle prior to bleeding in an abattoir is a penetrating captive bolt device, which is basically a piston driven forward by expanding gas produced by a blank cartridge. This creates a concussed state in the animal on impact with the skull, followed by penetration to prevent recovery by destroying key parts of the brain. The successful application of this device requires the correct cartridge strength for the species and accurate placement of the device. This paper examines the heads of animals that have received multiple shots in an attempt to ascertain the cause, to provide abattoirs with training material and an investigative tool to reduce the occurrences of multiple shots and reduce the consequent negative effects on animal welfare at slaughter.Ideally, the application of a penetrating captive bolt device to render cattle immediately unconscious prior to slaughter would be 100% effective. Unfortunately, due to various factors this is not always the case. This paper examined, as an initial proof of concept, 12 bovine heads which had received more than one shot from a penetrating captive bolt, collected from various abattoirs within the United Kingdom. The heads were frozen to facilitate splitting on the medial plane to prevent distortion of soft tissue and each sagittal section was examined macroscopically to ascertain if this method could be used to determine the reasons for repeated stun attempts. In 10 out of 12 heads, shot placement was the determining factor, in one other head it was felt that anatomical variation was the reason and the twelfth head demonstrated signs of gun malfunction as the likely cause. This work provides evidence for a larger trial to facilitate the production of guidance for the abattoir industry, the Animal Welfare Officer and regulators on the examination of heads as part of an investigation of failures of a mechanical stunning system and to provide training material for slaughter staff tasked with effectively stunning cattle.

Highlights

Unless undertaking religious slaughter practice, pre-slaughter stunning of cattle is a legal requirement of both European legislation [1] and United Kingdom National Legislation [2,3,4]
The findings from the post mortem inspections of the heads are detailed in Table 1, with descriptions of the findings for three of the heads, Head 8, Head 4 and Head 12 reported below
The macroscopic examination of sectioned bovine heads, in conjunction with other investigations, can be used as an aide to assess the reasons for an ineffective stun

Summary

Introduction

Unless undertaking religious slaughter practice, pre-slaughter stunning of cattle is a legal requirement of both European legislation [1] and United Kingdom National Legislation [2,3,4]. The European Regulations include the requirement for the presence of an Animal Welfare. The majority of bovines in the United Kingdom are stunned mechanically using penetrating captive bolt devices [5], with the exception of (a) abattoirs using systems such as the Jarvis electric. Animals 2019, 9, 328 system to stun-kill cattle, (b) those opting for non-stun slaughter under derogation of slaughter according to religious rite (Article 4) [1], and (c) those opting for the use of free bullets. The shot is targeted to affect either the cerebral hemispheres on a large scale, the reticular formation, ascending reticular activating system or the median thalamus bilaterally [7] (Figure 1)

Methods

Discussion

Conclusion