Abstract

Design of additively manufactured metallic parts requires computational models that can predict the mechanical response of parts considering the microstructural, manufacturing, and operating conditions. This article documents our response to Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Additive Manufacturing Modeling Challenge 3, which asks the participants to predict the mechanical response of tensile coupons of IN625 as function of microstructure and manufacturing conditions. A representative volume element (RVE) approach was coupled with a crystal plasticity material model solved within the Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) framework for mechanics to address the challenge. During the competition, material model calibration proved to be a challenge, prompting the introduction in this manuscript of an advanced material model identification method using proper generalized decomposition (PGD). Finally, a mechanistic reduced order method called Self-consistent Clustering Analysis (SCA) is shown as a possible alternative to the FFT method for solving these problems. Apart from presenting the response analysis, some physical interpretation and assumptions associated with the modeling are discussed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.