Abstract
A recent article by Shibata et al. [1] and an interview with the senior investigator Kobayashi [2], both in the October 2006 issue of Journal of Leukocyte Biology, discuss the role of macrophage-derived NO in the clearance of apoptotic cells. We were surprised that neither in the original paper nor in the accompanying interview was it discussed that these results rely entirely on data obtained in murine macrophages. It is, however, evident that there are differences in macrophage NO production and regulation among different species [3, 4]. Several years ago, we and others [5–7] described fundamental differences between macrophages from mice and humans regarding NO synthase (NOS) activity. Murine macrophages produce large amounts of NO and L-citrulline from L-arginine via induction of the inducible form of NOS (iNOS). In parallel, murine macrophages synthesize the obligatory cofactor tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), essential for stabilization and function of the iNOS enzyme protein [8, 9]. Human as well as macrophages from other animal species, such as rabbits, goats, or Syrian hamsters, do not have NOS activity nor do they synthesize BH4 [7, 10, 11]. In addition, murine macrophages consume most of the L-arginine by another enzyme—arginase—and convert it into L-ornithine. This arginase is not active in human macrophages too [7, 9, 12]. A lot of research has since been done to demonstrate nitrite production in human macrophages. Recent reviews claim that human macrophages have iNOS activity, albeit induced by other stimuli rather than those inducing nitrite production in murine macrophages [13]. We evaluated several of these stimuli and could show that nitrite was not produced by iNOS activity in human macrophages. The nitrite measured came from other noncellular sources [14]. None of the articles cited as proof for iNOS activity in human macrophages provides sound biochemical data about L-arginine consumption, BH4 synthesis, and L-citrulline production [13]. Moreover, they do not control for nitrite generation from other nonmacrophage sources [14]. The only report that demonstrates nitrite production from NOS activity in human macrophage-like cells is an article by Bertholet et al. [15]. There, the U937 monoblastic leukemia cell line was transfected with a plasmid containing a functional iNOS gene. Nitrite production by these cells, however, totally depended on substitution of the cofactor BH4 and additional substrate [15]. As species differences are not confined to NOS activity and are fundamental in many aspects of immunology [3, 16, 17], we propose that the species involved should be mentioned in the title and abstract of articles dealing with common aspects of immunity.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.