Abstract

Summary Condition is defined as the pool of resources available to an individual that can be allocated to fitness‐enhancing traits. Consequently, condition could influence developmental trade‐offs if any occur. Although many studies have manipulated diet to demonstrate condition‐dependent trait expression, few studies have determined the contribution of specific nutrients to condition or trade‐offs. We used nutritional geometry to quantify the effects of dietary protein and carbohydrate content on larval performance and the development of adult morphology including body size as well as a primary and secondary sexually selected trait in male broad‐horned beetles, Gnatocerus cornutus. We found that offspring survival, development rate and morphological traits were highly affected by dietary carbohydrate content and to a lesser extent by protein content and that all traits were maximized at a protein‐to‐carbohydrate ratio around 1:2. The absolute size of a secondary sexual character, the mandibles, had a heightened response to the increased availability and ratio of both macronutrients. Male genitalia, in contrast, were relatively insensitive to the increased availability of macronutrients. Overall, while nutrition influenced trait expression, the nutritional requirements of development rate and morphological traits were largely the same and resource acquisition seems to implement only weak trade‐offs in this species. This finding contrasts with some resource constraint predictions, as beetles seem able to simultaneously meet the nutritional requirements of most traits.

Highlights

  • Condition can be defined as the pool of resources that an organism has available to allocate to life history and reproductive traits (Rowe & Houle 1996)

  • Selected traits are likely to be especially sensitive to allocation trade-­‐offs as these characters are costly to produce, play no role in resource acquisition, and reduce the resources that can be allocated to other fitness-­‐enhancing traits (Rowe & Houle 1996; Tomkins et al 2004; Wagner Jr et al 2012)

  • The difference in linear gradients was due to the fact that body size was more responsive to C consumption than survival, whereas the difference in quadratic gradients was due to the curvature of the peak for P consumption being stronger for survival than body size (Table S2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Condition can be defined as the pool of resources that an organism has available to allocate to life history and reproductive traits (Rowe & Houle 1996). Selected traits are likely to be especially sensitive to allocation trade-­‐offs as these characters are costly to produce, play no role in resource acquisition, and reduce the resources that can be allocated to other fitness-­‐enhancing traits (Rowe & Houle 1996; Tomkins et al 2004; Wagner Jr et al 2012). Male genitalia are primarily subjected to sexual selection (Eberhard 1985; Hosken & Stockley 2004; House et al 2013), but are frequently less sensitive to variation in condition than other sexually selected characters (House & Simmons 2007). This seems to be a general pattern in invertebrates where the plasticity in genital morphology in response to condition is typically limited (Simmons 2013). Some evidence suggests that this may arise due to strong stabilizing sexual selection that is imposed by female mate choice for reproductive isolation at one extreme of the continuum or cryptic female at the other end (Eberhard 1985; McPeek et al 2008; Simmons 2013)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call