Abstract

Ab initio phasing of macromolecular structures, from the native intensities alone with no experimental phase information or previous particular structural knowledge, has been the object of a long quest, limited by two main barriers: structure size and resolution of the data. Current approaches to extend the scope of ab initio phasing include use of the Patterson function, density modification and data extrapolation. The authors' approach relies on the combination of locating model fragments such as polyalanine α-helices with the program PHASER and density modification with the program SHELXE. Given the difficulties in discriminating correct small substructures, many putative groups of fragments have to be tested in parallel; thus calculations are performed in a grid or supercomputer. The method has been named after the Italian painter Arcimboldo, who used to compose portraits out of fruit and vegetables. With ARCIMBOLDO, most collections of fragments remain a 'still-life', but some are correct enough for density modification and main-chain tracing to reveal the protein's true portrait. Beyond α-helices, other fragments can be exploited in an analogous way: libraries of helices with modelled side chains, β-strands, predictable fragments such as DNA-binding folds or fragments selected from distant homologues up to libraries of small local folds that are used to enforce nonspecific tertiary structure; thus restoring the ab initio nature of the method. Using these methods, a number of unknown macromolecules with a few thousand atoms and resolutions around 2 Å have been solved. In the 2014 release, use of the program has been simplified. The software mediates the use of massive computing to automate the grid access required in difficult cases but may also run on a single multicore workstation (http://chango.ibmb.csic.es/ARCIMBOLDO_LITE) to solve straightforward cases.

Highlights

  • One hundred years have passed since Max von Laue was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for his discovery of the diffraction of X-rays by crystals (Friedrich et al, 1912; von Laue, 1912)

  • Crystallography has become an essential tool of investigation throughout the sciences, as it provides information on molecular structure down to the atomic level with a degree of detail and accuracy that is unsurpassed by any other structural technique

  • The present work deals with approaches to phase structures tures out of secondary structure fragments and, if correct ab initio substituting the need for atomic resolution by enough, density modification succeeds in revealing the stereochemical knowledge through secondary structure frag- portrait of our protein, expanding to a nearly complete ments and local folds

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One hundred years have passed since Max von Laue was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for his discovery of the diffraction of X-rays by crystals (Friedrich et al, 1912; von Laue, 1912). In the field of macromolecular crystallography, initial phases are usually derived either experimentally from a substructure of reference atoms, intrinsic to the structure or incorporated, and data collected at one or more particular wavelengths (Hendrickson, 1991), or from the placement in the asymmetric unit of a model related to the target structure (Rossmann, 1972). For structures composed of fewer than 200 independent atoms, direct methods (Hauptman & Karle, 1953; Karle & Hauptman, 1956) are generally able to provide an initial model exclusively from the experimental intensities measured on a native crystal. Starting from an initial hypothesis, usually a set of randomly generated atoms, phases are calculated and modified according to direct methods relationships. Some of the structures solved ab initio with SHELXD required the location of a small fragment of known geometry to generate the initial hypothesis, rather than relying on a collection of totally random atoms. Benchmarks on test structures showed that a large number of cycles could lead to a solution even

96 Claudia Millan et al Macromolecular ab initio phasing
DNA-binding fragments
SHREDDER
BORGES
Central implementation on a workstation with access to a pool
Single-machine implementation
Findings
Outlook
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call