Abstract

Patterns of parasite morphological diversification were investigated using a morphological data base for the parasitic platyhelminths comprising 1,459 characters analyzed using phylogenetic systematic methods. Only 10.8% of the 1,882 character transformations are losses, casting doubt on views that parasites are secondarily simplified and exhibit degenerate evolution. Chi-squared analysis indicates that character loss in the Digenea and Monogenea occurs in proportion to total change and is disproportionately lower within the Eucestoda. In the Digenea fewer female characters and more male characters have been lost than expected by the total number of characters in that group, and more male and more nonreproductive characters have been lost in proportion to their distribution across groups. In the Monogenea fewer nonreproductive and more larval characters have been lost than expected within the group, and female character loss is high relative to other groups. In the Eucestoda fewer female and more larval characters have been lost than expected within the group, whereas loss of male and nonreproductive character is low, and loss of larval characters is high, compared to the other groups. Patterns of character loss result partially from characters that show repeated (homoplasious) loss in different groups. High consistency index and low homoplasy slope ratio values indicate that the parasitic platyhelminths show unusually low levels of homoplasy, casting doubt on views that parasite morphology is unusually adaptively plastic. Homoplasy within the monogeneans occurs in proportion to overall character change, is slightly higher than expected in the digeneans, and is much lower than expected within the eucestodes. Homoplasy occurs less often than expected in larval characters, and more often than expected in nonreproductive characters in the Digenea. Monogeneans show more homoplasy than expected for larval characters both within and among groups. Eucestodes show fewer homoplasious male and nonreproductive, and more homoplasious larval, characters than expected within the group, and higher homoplasy in larval characters and lower homoplasy in female and nonreproductive characters among groups.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.