Abstract

The abundance of the divaricate growth form in New Zealand has been interpreted as either (a) the response of an isolated flora to cool, dry, Plio-Pleistocene climates; or (b) a defense against large browsing birds (moa) that were hunted to extinction shortly after human arrival during the last millennium. We used patterns of divaricate plant abundance across present-day landscapes to test a novel synthetic hypothesis: that the divaricate form is of most value to plants on fertile soils that attract herbivores, on sites where climatic constraints prevent plants from quickly growing out of the browse zone. This hypothesis predicts that divaricate species should be most abundant on terraces (landforms that are both fertile and frost-prone) in regions that are cold and dry, and should be scarce across all topographic positions in the warmest (largely frost-free) regions. To address our hypothesis, we first tested the influence of topography on frost regimes and nutrient levels by measuring temperatures and soil total C, N, and P at four standard topographic positions at five localities differing widely in macroclimate. We then extracted a dataset of 236 surveys comprising 9,877 relevé plots from the New Zealand National Vegetation Survey databank. We calculated the proportion of arborescent species with a divaricate growth form and the proportion of total arborescentcover contributed by divaricates on each plot; we then fitted linear mixed-effect models predicting these response variables as functions of topographic position and climate. The number of frosts recorded averaged <1 yr–1 at the warmest of the five sites studied, to >60 yr–1 on all topographic positions at the coldest site. Terraces were subject to more frequent and harder frosts than any other topographic position. Topography had no significant influence on total N or C:N, but total P was higher on terraces and in gullies than on faces or ridges. Frost-free period was the dominant influence on both species representation and cover of divaricate plants throughout the country. The effect of topography was also significant, but weaker. The effect of frost-free period was stronger on sites with water deficits than on sites where precipitation exceeded evapotranspiration. Divaricates made their largest contributions on terraces in cold, dry regions; as predicted, they were scarce on all topographic positions on sites with frost-free periods >300 days. Our hypothesis was generally supported, although the effect of topography on divaricate abundance was not as strong as some previous studies led us to expect. Divaricates made their largest contributions to arborescent species richness and cover on sites where climatic restrictions on growth coincide with relatively high nutrient availability. The contemporary distribution of the divaricate form across New Zealand landscapes thus appears to be reasonably well explained by the hypothesized interaction of climate and fertility-mediated browsing, although experiments may provide more conclusive tests of this hypothesis.

Highlights

  • More than 120 years after the first treatment of New Zealand’s divaricate plants in the scientific literature (e.g., Diels, 1897), scientists continue to debate the causes of the local abundance of this distinctive growth form (Bond et al, 2004; Lusk et al, 2016; Wood and Wilmshurst, 2017)

  • We found the landform index distinguished well between our ridge, terrace and gully sites, but was less successful in separating faces from terraces or gullies, reflecting the variety of landscapes encompassed by our five localities (Figure 1)

  • The data were mostly consistent with our hypothesis that the divaricate form is of most value to plants on fertile soils, on sites where climatic constraints prevent plants from quickly growing out of the browse zone

Read more

Summary

Introduction

More than 120 years after the first treatment of New Zealand’s divaricate plants in the scientific literature (e.g., Diels, 1897), scientists continue to debate the causes of the local abundance of this distinctive growth form (Bond et al, 2004; Lusk et al, 2016; Wood and Wilmshurst, 2017). Diels (1897) suggested the divaricate form conferred resistance to harsh climates, and arose in response to the Plio-Pleistocene onset of frosty, droughty environments. McGlone and Webb (1981) further developed this hypothesis, arguing that the divaricate form represents the evolutionary response of an isolated and essentially subtropical flora to the climatic fluctuations of the Plio-Pleistocene period, and that it may enable plants to cope with the unpredictable occurrence of frost, drought and wind in modern New Zealand’s oceanic climates. Recent modeling confirms an association with frosty and droughty habitats: divaricate species contribute most to arborescent assemblages in the eastern South Island, on sites with cold winters and where evapotranspiration exceeds precipitation; they are well represented in the central North Island, where the frost-free period is

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call