Abstract
Nickel-titanium endodontic files are more flexible than stainless steel. Little information is reported concerning machining efficiency and wear resistance of nickel titanium. This study assessed the dentin-machining ability and wear resistance of nickel titanium endodontic files in vitro. The method described earlier to assess machining efficiency and wear resistance of stainless steel files was used. Eight different types and brands of nickel titanium files were studied: Ultra-Flex Hedström, Ultra-Flex K, Mity Hedstrom, Mity K, Mity Turbo, Hedstrom Naviflex NT, NiTiFlex, and Hyflex X-file. Thirty files of each brand were evaluated. One-way ANOVA and t tests were performed to analyze the data. Considerable variation was found in matching efficiency and wear. The best initial machining ability of all nickel titanium instruments was recorded for the Hyflex-X file (0.60 +/- 0.16 mm2); the poorest performance was for the Mity Turbo file, which machined less than one third of the best performing instrument (0.19 +/- 0.12 mm2). We compared our results with results of a previous study of stainless steel endodontic files and concluded that nickel titanium instruments are as aggressive as or better than stainless steel instruments in removing dentin. They are also more durable than their stainless steel counterparts.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
