Abstract

Monitoring leaf Chlorophyll (Chl) in-situ is labor-intensive, limiting representative sampling for detailed mapping of Chl variability at field scales across time. Unmanned aeria-l vehicles (UAV) and hyperspectral cameras provide flexible platforms for observing agricultural systems, overcoming this spatio-temporal sampling constraint. Here, we evaluate a customized machine learning (ML) workflow to retrieve multi-temporal leaf-Chl levels, combining sub-centimeter resolution UAV-hyperspectral imagery (400–1,000 nm) with leaf-level reflectance spectra and SPAD measurements, capturing temporal correlations, selecting relevant predictors, and retrieving accurate results under different conditions. The study is performed within a phenotyping experiment to monitor wild tomato plants’ development. Several analyses were conducted to evaluate multiple ML strategies, including: (1) exploring sequential versus retraining learning; (2) comparing insights gained from using 272 spectral bands versus 60 pigment-based vegetation indices (VIs); and (3) assessing six regression methods (linear, partial-least-square regression; PLSR, decision trees, support vector, ensemble trees, and Gaussian process; GPR). Goodness-of-fit (R2) and accuracy metrics (MAE, RMSE) were determined using training/testing and validation data subsets to assess the models’ performance. Overall, while equally good performance was obtained using either PLSR, GPR, or random forest, results show: (1) the retraining strategy improved the ability of most of the approaches to model SPAD-based Chl dynamics; (2) comparative analysis between retrievals and validation data distributions informed the models’ ability to capture Chl dynamics through SPAD levels; (3) VI predictors slightly improved R2 (e.g., from 0.59 to 0.74 units for GPR) and accuracy (e.g., MAE and RMSE differences of up to 2 SPAD units) in specific algorithms; (4) feature importance examined through these methods, revealed strong overlaps between relevant bands and VI predictors, highlighting a few decisive spectral ranges and indices useful for retrieving leaf-Chl levels. The proposed ML framework allows the retrieval of high-quality spatially distributed and multi-temporal SPAD-based chlorophyll maps at an ultra-high pixel resolution (e.g., 7 mm).

Highlights

  • Chlorophyll (Chl) is the primary pigment that drives the exchange of energy required for sugar production through photosynthesis, which sustains life, produces oxygen, and regulates CO2 for the entire planet

  • In-situ observations were split into a training/testing subset used to fit the models through cross-validation and estimate R2, and a validation subset was employed to assess the accuracy of the models via root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE)

  • It was determined that a retraining learning strategy, whereby a model is updated as new data becomes available, proved superior in capturing the temporal dynamics of Soil Plant Analysis Development (SPAD)-based Chl

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Chlorophyll (Chl) is the primary pigment that drives the exchange of energy required for sugar production through photosynthesis, which sustains life, produces oxygen, and regulates CO2 for the entire planet. From the interaction of visible solar radiation with leaves (approximately 400–750 nm), around 85% is absorbed by leaf pigments to fuel the photosynthesis processes, 10% is reflected, 2% is emitted as fluorescence, and the rest is transmitted (Lambers and Oliveira, 2019). This balance can vary depending on the chlorophyll content and concentration throughout the plant developmental phases, which itself is subject to environmental factors that influence physiological responses like growth, structural changes, and stress. From the diversity of methods available for examining leaf chlorophyll content, two of the most widely used include a destructive laboratory procedure based on in vitro spectrophotometric techniques (Wellburn, 1994; Porra, 2002; Netto et al, 2005) and a non-destructive method based on in-situ observations collected via chlorophyll meters, such as the Soil Plant Analysis Development (SPAD) system (Yuan et al, 2016; Shah et al, 2017; Dong et al, 2019)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call