Abstract

We present an innovative method for predicting the dynamic electron correlation energy of an atom or a bond in a molecule utilizing topological atoms. Our approach uses the machine learning method Kriging (Gaussian Process Regression with a non-zero mean function) to predict these dynamic electron correlation energy contributions. The true energy values are calculated by partitioning the MP2 two-particle density-matrix via the Interacting Quantum Atoms (IQA) procedure. To our knowledge, this is the first time such energies have been predicted by a machine learning technique. We present here three important proof-of-concept cases: the water monomer, the water dimer, and the van der Waals complex H2···He. These cases represent the final step toward the design of a full IQA potential for molecular simulation. This final piece will enable us to consider situations in which dispersion is the dominant intermolecular interaction. The results from these examples suggest a new method by which dispersion potentials for molecular simulation can be generated.

Highlights

  • Dynamic electron correlation is a quantum mechanical phenomenon with profound ramifications for intermolecular interactions.[1−3] Typical quantum chemical methods commonly employed, such as DFT, generally do not completely include many of these correlation effects, and in some cases they are not included at all

  • In the current article we present the final energy contribution needed in order to complete the full description of the FFLUX force field for a chemical system’s dynamics: here we show how the MP2 correlation energy can be partitioned and successfully predicted by Machine learning (ML) methods

  • A training set of 40 geometries was created for the construction of Kriging models, which were tested on 60 geometries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dynamic electron correlation is a quantum mechanical phenomenon with profound ramifications for intermolecular interactions.[1−3] Typical quantum chemical methods commonly employed, such as DFT, generally do not completely include many of these correlation effects, and in some cases they are not included at all. A plethora of methods exists to obtain Electron Correlation Energies (ECE) These methods range from empirical potentials in simulation methods[4−12] to a posteriori corrections in DFT or ab initio wave function methods.[13−18] In addition, more recently, many-body correction terms have been employed to supplement DFT.[16,19]. These methods have been applied to a wide variety of important chemical systems including the solid state,[20−22] biological materials,[23] and more recently nanostructures.[24−26] Recent work has seen much improvement in methods[16,27] to account for ECE. Electron correlation is proportionally a small contribution energetically, it is ubiquitous and has been shown to be responsible for macroscopic phenomena, such as an explanation of the gecko’s ability to adhere to a variety of surfaces.[28]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call