Abstract

This research uses machine-learned computational analyses to predict the cognitive performance impairment of rats induced by irradiation. The experimental data in the analyses is from a rodent model exposed to ≤15 cGy of individual galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) ions: 4He, 16O, 28Si, 48Ti, or 56Fe, expected for a Lunar or Mars mission. This work investigates rats at a subject-based level and uses performance scores taken before irradiation to predict impairment in attentional set-shifting (ATSET) data post-irradiation. Here, the worst performing rats of the control group define the impairment thresholds based on population analyses via cumulative distribution functions, leading to the labeling of impairment for each subject. A significant finding is the exhibition of a dose-dependent increasing probability of impairment for 1 to 10 cGy of 28Si or 56Fe in the simple discrimination (SD) stage of the ATSET, and for 1 to 10 cGy of 56Fe in the compound discrimination (CD) stage. On a subject-based level, implementing machine learning (ML) classifiers such as the Gaussian naïve Bayes, support vector machine, and artificial neural networks identifies rats that have a higher tendency for impairment after GCR exposure. The algorithms employ the experimental prescreen performance scores as multidimensional input features to predict each rodent’s susceptibility to cognitive impairment due to space radiation exposure. The receiver operating characteristic and the precision-recall curves of the ML models show a better prediction of impairment when 56Fe is the ion in question in both SD and CD stages. They, however, do not depict impairment due to 4He in SD and 28Si in CD, suggesting no dose-dependent impairment response in these cases. One key finding of our study is that prescreen performance scores can be used to predict the ATSET performance impairments. This result is significant to crewed space missions as it supports the potential of predicting an astronaut’s impairment in a specific task before spaceflight through the implementation of appropriately trained ML tools. Future research can focus on constructing ML ensemble methods to integrate the findings from the methodologies implemented in this study for more robust predictions of cognitive decrements due to space radiation exposure.

Highlights

  • The current record for the longest single flight a NASA astronaut spent on the International Space Station is 340 days (NASA, 2020), and travelers aboard are partially shielded from galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) and Solar Particle Events by Earth’s magnetic field (Chancellor et al, 2014)

  • The work in this paper follows the computational analysis process illustrated in Figure 1, which serves as a visual guide to locate specific algorithms within the text

  • A pass/fail score for the HAB stage is recorded, but since this study considers only the rats that passed habituation, this column is omitted from the datasets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The current record for the longest single flight a NASA astronaut spent on the International Space Station is 340 days (NASA, 2020), and travelers aboard are partially shielded from galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) and Solar Particle Events by Earth’s magnetic field (Chancellor et al, 2014). Many studies utilize the novel object recognition, Barnes maze, Morris water maze, active avoidance, open field, or operant responding as the appropriate behavioral assays to evaluate rodents’ cognitive impairment (Rabin et al, 1998, 2011, 2015; Britten et al, 2012; Lonart et al, 2012; Haley et al, 2013; Hadley et al, 2016; Parihar et al, 2016, 2018; Carr et al, 2018; Jewell et al, 2018; Shukitt-hale et al, 2018; Kiffer et al, 2019) Another test that assesses executive cognitive functions in rats is the attentional set-shifting (ATSET) test (Birrell and Brown, 2000; Young et al, 2010), which is a seven-stage test analog to the human Wisconsin Card-Sorting Test (WCST) (Grant and Berg, 1948; Eling et al, 2008). The WCST estimates cognitive flexibility such as attention, perseverance, working memory, abstract thinking, and set-shifting

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call