Abstract

Accurate stratification of sepsis can effectively guide the triage of patient care and shared decision making in the emergency department (ED). However, previous research on sepsis identification models focused mainly on ICU patients, and discrepancies in model performance between the development and external validation datasets are rarely evaluated. The aim of our study was to develop and externally validate a machine learning model to stratify sepsis patients in the ED. We retrospectively collected clinical data from two geographically separate institutes that provided a different level of care at different time periods. The Sepsis-3 criteria were used as the reference standard in both datasets for identifying true sepsis cases. An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm was developed to stratify sepsis patients and the performance of the model was compared with traditional clinical sepsis tools; quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS). There were 8296 patients (1752 (21%) being septic) in the development and 1744 patients (506 (29%) being septic) in the external validation datasets. The mortality of septic patients in the development and validation datasets was 13.5% and 17%, respectively. In the internal validation, XGBoost achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.86, exceeding SIRS (0.68) and qSOFA (0.56). The performance of XGBoost deteriorated in the external validation (the AUROC of XGBoost, SIRS and qSOFA was 0.75, 0.57 and 0.66, respectively). Heterogeneity in patient characteristics, such as sepsis prevalence, severity, age, comorbidity and infection focus, could reduce model performance. Our model showed good discriminative capabilities for the identification of sepsis patients and outperformed the existing sepsis identification tools. Implementation of the ML model in the ED can facilitate timely sepsis identification and treatment. However, dataset discrepancies should be carefully evaluated before implementing the ML approach in clinical practice. This finding reinforces the necessity for future studies to perform external validation to ensure the generalisability of any developed ML approaches.

Highlights

  • Sepsis, defined as “life threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated hostSepsis, defined as “life threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection” [1], is a global health problem with high mortality and morbidity response to infection” [1], is a global health problem with high mortality and morbidity [2].[2]

  • In our external validation dataset, the average triage-to-antibiotic time for patients coded as having sepsis was 3.18 h, whereas the average triage-to-antibiotic time for true sepsis patients was 3.96 h (Table 2)

  • We developed and externally validated an ML model to correctly identify sepsis in patients admitted to the emergency department (ED)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sepsis, defined as “life threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host. Sepsis, defined as “life threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection” [1], is a global health problem with high mortality and morbidity response to infection” [1], is a global health problem with high mortality and morbidity [2]. Numerous ous studies [8,9,10] have demonstrated that timely identification of sepsis and initiation of studies [8,9,10] have demonstrated that timely identification of sepsis and initiation of an an evidenced-based treatment protocol could decrease in-hospital mortality, shorten evidenced-based treatment protocol could decrease in-hospital mortality, shorten length of length of stay and reduce healthcare costs. Because of the heterogeneity of infectious infectious insults and the diversity of hosts, efficiently recognising and treating sepsis reinsults and the diversity of hosts, efficiently recognising and treating sepsis remains highly mains highly physicians [11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call