Abstract

Reducing green urban infrastructure pose a huge threat to cities sustainability. It is important to monitor and track the health of vegetation. For efficient planning of urban development and maintenance of green urban infrastructure, the key is to have up to date maps. Using satellite imagery is the easiest way to cover large city areas. In order to map vegetation, there are many possible solutions; however, the most effective way is using machine learning methods. Machine learning is divided into supervised and unsupervised classification and each can be divided into several different methods. Many authors have considered different methods and they use them to access accuracy on satellite image information extraction. They have used different satellite images and naturally higher resolution imagery results in better classification. However, there is still lack of comprehensive analysis of more supervised machine learning methods in similar cities. This paper aims to provide analysis of four different machine learning methods: support vector machine, artificial neural network, naïve Bayes and random forest. The objective of the support vector machine algorithm is to find a hyperplane in an N-dimensional space that distinctly classifies the data points where hyperplanes are decision boundaries that help to classify the data points and support vectors data points that are closer to the hyperplane and influence the position and orientation of the hyperplane. Artificial neural networks are brain-inspired systems which are intended to replicate the way that humans learn. Neural networks consist of input and output layers, and hidden layers. They are excellent tools for finding patterns which are far too complex or numerous for a human programmer to extract and teach the machine to recognize. A Naive Bayes classifier is a probabilistic machine learning model that is used for classification task and the crux of the classifier is based on the Bayes theorem. Random Forest creates a forest and makes it random and is an ensemble of Decision Trees, most of the time trained with the bagging method which general idea is that a combination of learning models increases the overall result. All of the mentioned methods will be tested on Sentinel-2A imagery. Sentinel-2A multispectral imager has thirteen sensors which is useful in vegetation extraction. Methods will be compared using error matrix and kappa statistics.

Highlights

  • Since more and more people are living in cities, it has become extremely important to plan and manage green urban areas

  • The study areas are located in two towns in Croatia: Varaždin and Osijek

  • Under column support vector machines (SVMs) (Support Vector Machine) and NB there is only one record because for SVM is in this paper presented only the best combination of parameters from [15], while for NB there are no combination of parameter available as mentioned previously in text

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since more and more people are living in cities, it has become extremely important to plan and manage green urban areas. The authors in [11] compared artificial neural networks with random forest and SVMs for crop classification using high-resolution RapidEye imagery They concluded that SVM outperformed the other two machine learning methods. The authors in [15] explored how different kernels affect the land cover classification results using Sentinel-2 imagery They found that the radial basis function produced the highest accuracy and proposed further research using different machine learning methods. The authors in [15] concluded that the RBF kernel provides the best results with γ = 1 and C = 28, where γ is the free parameter of the radial basis function and C is parameter that allows to trade off training error versus model complexity They made conclusion based on experiment on two cities in Croatia on Sentinel 2 imagery. Classification accuracy rank was modified from [34]

Classification Accuracy moderate high very high
Maximum tree depth Maximum sample count Maximum number of categories
NB RF
Random Forest
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call