Abstract

For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) provides them with the optimal prognosis. However, no reliable prediction model is presently available. We evaluated the performance of an artificial neural network (ANN) model in pCR prediction in patients with LARC. Predictive accuracy was compared between the ANN, k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), naïve Bayes classifier (NBC), and multiple logistic regression (MLR) models. Data from two hundred seventy patients with LARC were used to compare the efficacy of the forecasting models. We trained the model with an estimation data set and evaluated model performance with a validation data set. The ANN model significantly outperformed the KNN, SVM, NBC, and MLR models in pCR prediction. Our results revealed that the post-CRT carcinoembryonic antigen is the most influential pCR predictor, followed by intervals between CRT and surgery, chemotherapy regimens, clinical nodal stage, and clinical tumor stage. The ANN model was a more accurate pCR predictor than other conventional prediction models. The predictors of pCR can be used to identify which patients with LARC can benefit from watch-and-wait approaches.

Highlights

  • For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), achieving a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) provides them with the optimal prognosis

  • Patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) have the most favorable survival and tumor control, but only 10–30% of patients with LARC achieve a pCR to neoadjuvant CRT4​ –7

  • The support vector machine (SVM) model is a supervised learning model associated with learning algorithms that analyse information used for regression analysis and c­ lassification[13]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) provides them with the optimal prognosis. We evaluated the performance of an artificial neural network (ANN) model in pCR prediction in patients with LARC. Predictive accuracy was compared between the ANN, k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), naïve Bayes classifier (NBC), and multiple logistic regression (MLR) models. The ANN model significantly outperformed the KNN, SVM, NBC, and MLR models in pCR prediction. The identification of useful predictors of a pCR in patients with LARC after neoadjuvant CRT is vital. Few studies have compared the artificial neural network (ANN), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC), and multiple logistic regression (MLR) models with respect to internal validity (reproducibility). The interpretation of neural networks is more complicated than that of other statistical models, the ANN model has been used in various medical fields

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call