Abstract

LC/ESI/HRMS is increasingly employed for monitoring chemical pollutants in water samples, with non-targeted analysis becoming more common. Unfortunately, due to the lack of analytical standards, non-targeted analysis is mostly qualitative. To remedy this, models have been developed to evaluate the response of compounds from their structure, which can then be used for quantification in non-targeted analysis. Still, these models rely on tentatively known structures while for most detected compounds, a list of structural candidates, or sometimes only exact mass and retention time are identified. In this study, a quantification approach was developed, where LC/ESI/HRMS descriptors are used for quantification of compounds even if the structure is unknown. The approach was developed based on 92 compounds analyzed in parallel in both positive and negative ESI mode with mobile phases at pH 2.7, 8.0, and 10.0. The developed approach was compared with two baseline approaches— one assuming equal response factors for all compounds and one using the response factor of the closest eluting standard. The former gave a mean prediction error of a factor of 29, while the latter gave a mean prediction error of a factor of 1300. In the machine learning-based quantification approach developed here, the corresponding prediction error was a factor of 10. Furthermore, the approach was validated by analyzing two blind samples containing 48 compounds spiked into tap water and ultrapure water. The obtained mean prediction error was lower than a factor of 6.0 for both samples. The errors were found to be comparable to approaches using structural information.

Highlights

  • In medicine, agriculture, and industry, thousands of chemicals are used every day, and these may end up in the environment [1]

  • The difficulty in quantification of the detected compounds arises from the great variations in ionization efficiency between compounds in the electrospray ionization source, which spans over six orders of magnitude [8]

  • The response factors were predicted for compounds detected in the training and test sets with positive and negative ionization mode for mobile phases with pH 2.7, 8.0, and 10.0, with the respective six models using LC/MS descriptors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Agriculture, and industry, thousands of chemicals are used every day, and these may end up in the environment [1]. Due to the lack of analytical standards for a majority of the tentatively identified compounds, the results of non-targeted analysis are primarily qualitative rather than quantitative [5]. The difficulty in quantification of the detected compounds arises from the great variations in ionization efficiency between compounds in the electrospray ionization source, which spans over six orders of magnitude [8]. Due to this difference, two compounds may give very different signals in the mass spectrometer even if the concentrations are equal [9]. Absolute quantification of the identified compounds is primarily possible using analytical standards

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call